Cigarette Ratings
- Author Kat Harison
- Published March 9, 2011
- Word count 862
The New Jersey Senator uncovered a lengthy history of false and deceptive cigarette ratings and marketing methods used by the tobacco industry. ... Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ) chaired a Senate Commerce Committee hearing to examine the accuracy of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) tar and nicotine cigarette rating system, and the marketing claims of tobacco companies based on these ratings. The New Jersey Senator uncovered a lengthy history of false and deceptive cigarette ratings and marketing methods used by the tobacco industry. Altria (Philip Morris) and R.J. Reynolds were called to the hearing but refused to attend.
"Tobacco companies need to be honest with smokers about tar and nicotine exposure. We learned today that the FTC tobacco ratings system deceives smokers, plain and simple. It is now clear that the tobacco industry has been aware of the inaccuracy of these ratings for more than three decades," said Sen. Lautenberg. At a Commerce Committee hearing chaired by Lautenberg, the FTC raised concerns about its testing methods and admitted that its ratings tend to be relatively poor predictors of tar and nicotine exposure, noting how machine-measured tar and nicotine ratings are not an accurate reflection of tar and nicotine intake. A document released at the hearing shows that the tobacco industry had knowledge of the inaccuracy of the ratings since the 1970s. Sen. Lautenberg held this hearing to illustrate how the FTC cigarette testing method is not an accurate measure for rating tar and nicotine in cigarettes and how the tobacco industry used the method to mislead smokers into thinking "light" and "low-tar" cigarettes are healthier and safer than regular cigarettes.
The FTC cigarette testing method uses a smoking machine - a "smoking robot"- that smokes every cigarette exactly the same way to determine the amount of tar and nicotine in each brand of cigarettes. According to this method, some cigarettes appear to deliver lower tar and nicotine than regular cigarettes. These cigarettes are usually described as "light" and "low-tar" by the tobacco industry. However, when smoked by actual smokers, light and low-tar cigarettes often cause the smoker to receive more tar and nicotine than regular cigarettes. This is because light cigarette smokers take longer, deeper puffs and smoke more cigarettes a day to compensate for the lower nicotine in these cigarettes. As early as 1975, the tobacco industry knew that "light" cigarettes did not actually deliver less tar and nicotine to smokers despite the lower ratings from the FTC Cigarette Testing Method. Despite knowing this, the tobacco industry continues to market these cigarettes as healthier and safer than regular cigarettes.
Many smokers switch to cigarette brands advertised as "low tar" or "light" out of concerns for their health, believing them to be less risky or a step toward quitting. Due to the misleading and deceptive marketing of light cigarettes by the tobacco industry, some light cigarette smokers have filed state lawsuits asserting that the companies committed fraud when they misled consumers into believing that light cigarettes contained less tar and nicotine even though they knew this was false. The following participants testified at today’s hearing: - William Kovacic, Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission. - Cathy Backinger, Acting Chief, Tobacco Control Research Branch, National Cancer Institute. - David L. Ashley, PhD, Chief, Division of Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. - Jon Samet, MD, Chairman, Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins University. - Jack Henningfield, PhD, Adjunct Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. - Marvin Goldberg, PhD, Professor of Marketing, Penn State University. - Stephen Sheller, JD, Founder and Managing Partner, Sheller, P.C. - Altria (Philip Morris) and R.J. Reynolds were called to the hearing but refused to attend. Senator Lautenberg’s Record On Anti-Tobacco Issues 1987 - Wrote the law banning smoking on airline flights of 2 hours or less. 1989 - Wrote the law banning smoking on airline flights of 6 hours or less.
This covered approximately 99 percent of all domestic flights. 1994 - Wrote the law banning smoking in buildings where federally funded children’s programs took place. This includes all public schools, and federally funded day care centers. 1996 - Introduced legislation to provide a financial incentive for states to successfully sue the tobacco industry to recoup Medicaid expenditures stemming from tobacco-related illnesses. 1997 - Introduced bipartisan legislation that would have required tobacco companies to disclose the ingredients and carcinogens in their products to the public and affixed larger warning labels with more direct messages to kids. - Introduced legislation on secondhand smoke limitations that later served as the basis for such regulations in the proposed global tobacco settlement. - Named Vice-Chair of the Democratic Tobacco Task Force in the Senate in recognition of his leadership on the public health side of the tobacco debate.
2005 - Introduced an amendment in the Senate Commerce Committee that would ban cigarette companies from labeling cigarettes as "Light" and "Low-tar" based on the FTC cigarette testing method. This amendment was defeated on a party-line vote. 2006 - Introduced the "Truth in Cigarette Labeling Act" to ban cigarette companies from labeling cigarettes as "Light" and "Low-tar" based on the FTC cigarette testing method.
http://www.shop-cigarette.com/articles/cigarette-ratings-page/
For more tobacco reviews and news visit http://www.shop-cigarette.com/articles/cigarette-ratings-page/
Article source: https://articlebiz.comRate article
Article comments
There are no posted comments.
Related articles
- What Brand is Best for Digital Cameras? A Detailed Guide to Choosing the Right Brand in 2024
- How Big Should a Bath Sheet Be? Finding the Perfect Size for Comfort and Style
- The Ultimate Guide to Digital Scales and Body Analyzers: Elevate Your Fitness Tracking
- Are Shower Curtains Toxic? What You Need to Know to Keep Your Bathroom Safe
- How Much Is a Sofa Set? A Comprehensive Guide to Sofa Set Prices and What Affects Them
- Are Sectional Sofas Good for Small Spaces? Maximizing Comfort and Style in Tight Areas
- Best Slim Cases for iPhone 15: Sleek Protection for Your New Device
- Is It Worth Getting a Food Dehydrator? Discover the Benefits and Tips for Smart Use
- Balloon Zone Dubai: Your Premier Destination for Stunning Balloons in Dubai!
- 4 Top rated NMN supplement:Liposomal NMN vs regular NMN
- Effervescent Elegance: Experience Sprudelux Sparkling Water Makers
- From Smart Fridges to Robot Vacuums: The Future of Home Appliances
- Blast From the Past: Compact Digital Cameras Make a Comeback!
- Get Clued in on the Skinny about Dietary Supplements!
- PIX Unleashing Peak Performance – The Game-Changing Duo for Your Industry
- Revolutionizing Retail: The Power of Computer Vision in Frictionless-Checkout Kiosks
- Capturing Memories Made Easy: Cameras at Target
- JAG Super Compact Pod - Fishing Review
- Understanding Vax Vacuum Parts: A Comprehensive Guide
- Do people still wear designer belts?
- "See Clearly: How to Choose the Right Optician in Liverpool for Your Eye Health Needs"
- 5 Smart Hardware Items That Make Your Home More Stylish
- Ostrich Oil for Hair Care
- 5 of the Best Home Dehumidifiers in the UK
- What is the deal with Barefoot Shoes?
- Make Your Life Easier With Gadgets
- 36 DD - The question for the perfect bra and the surprises along the way.
- GREAT LIP COLOR DUO FOR DARKER SKIN TONES AND WOMEN OF COLOR
- A Personalised Name Necklace Made Just for You
- How to reduce deformation of aluminum alloy stamping parts