Chris Devonshire-Ellis on The Unilever Fine
- Author Chris Devonshire-Ellis
- Published July 11, 2011
- Word count 651
In another reminder of China’s "market access with socialist characteristics," the country’s National Reform and Development Commission on Friday levied a RMB2 million (US$307,000) fine on Unilever for publicizing planned price increases. China still very much likes to control consumer prices, particularly in FMCG, and the market is highly regulated. The reasons for this are not to do with inflation, but far more to do with the long-term view that China is maintaining price stability and is sustaining a relatively level playing field for all. In fact, inflation seems to be coming down.
China has long had market controls in place, ever since the revolution, where the hoarding of grains and other commodities to raise prices were considered capitalist tendencies and deemed as putting profit before the people. Such instigators were routinely executed in the early days of the revolution, and the sensitivity over consumer goods pricing and the expectations of Chinese consumers has long been a political issue. I recall, for example, some 12 to 15 years ago in China when foreign market research firms were routinely forbidden to conduct market surveys, especially in more rural areas. The Chinese government knew very well that asking less wealthy families questions such as "Do you have a refrigerator?" and "When would you like to buy a car?" would raise consumer expectations faster than the government could raise incomes to help meet them.
Likewise, advertising campaigns are routinely censored when deemed to raise the expectations of China’s rural population too far. Showing images of scantily clad models posing around a brand new sedan while spouting off information about cheap loans isn’t going to cut the mustard with a peasant farmer growing beetroot in Gansu. Instead, he’ll feel disenfranchised, and grow resentful. Social unrest usually follows, and the Unilever example has nothing to do with inflation or blaming its effects on foreign MNCs. Rather more, with the Communist party about to celebrate its 90th birthday in China this coming July, and the last thing the CCP wants to see are grumbles and restlessness over the prices of consumer goods.
Unilever made their comments over having to increase prices as a direct result of raw material costs increasing, which is not an unusual subject matter in the West. But in China, consumers reacted rather differently, and went out on mass buying sprees to hoard what they could, in some cases resulting in certain brands selling at a rate 100 times faster than normal. The potential social stigma with daily necessities being subject to price increases at a time when inflation is already causing problems for lower income families is not something the CCP want to see, especially when apparently instigated via media interviews (Unilever made their price rise comments to several Chinese journalists).
The reality in China is that price controls are a tool to be used by the government and the mere capitalist aims of a corporation’s bottom line is not a priority. Unilever’s response was fast and contrite, as the author knows full well is best when having angered government.
"As a company with a long term commitment to China, we accept the decision and continue to be sensitive to the local environment," Unilever said in an official statement.
That of course also means that Unilever will have to absorb the increased costs of raw materials instead of passing them onto the consumer. Bang goes their 2011 business plan for China, but they’re still in the game, and that’s what counts here. Otherwise, I can point to three lessons to be gleaned from all this: first, if you are selling FMCG or commodities in China, it pays to talk to the government before raising retail prices; secondly, be careful what you say about sales strategy and pricing to the media; and third, now would be a rather good time to be investing in raw material and commodity stocks.
This article was written by Chris Devonshire-Ellis for China business news site, China-Briefing.com.
Article source: https://articlebiz.comRate article
Article comments
There are no posted comments.
Related articles
- The Role of Lighting Stores in Brampton: Shaping Spaces for the Future
- The Role of Commercial Cleaning Services in Auckland: A Comprehensive Guide
- Exploring the World of Chauffeur Service: Benefits, Challenges, and Best Practices
- Nerds and Geeks: They still live on!
- IQ Tests: History, Uses, and Choosing a Reliable Resource
- 8 Great Ways To Teach Kids About Oral Hygiene
- App Development as a Catalyst for Business Growth
- Costs of arranging a Mortgage in Spain
- TikTok and Instagram: Ways you will grow and learn.
- Mustang GT: Ford Motor Company is a Rising Force!
- 10 Ways to Transform Production Scheduling in Business Central
- Elevating Your Home with Bold Decor and Vintage Carved Doors
- The Ultimate Skin Care Guide for Every Weather
- Do I Need Insurance When I Rent a Boat?
- Casino Bonuses: How to Maximize Your Rewards and Enhance Your Gameplay
- Was Joseph Stalin a good or bad leader of the Soviet Union?
- Top 5 Slots with the Highest RTP: A Winning Guarantee or a Myth?
- The Thrill of the Hunt Discovering the World of Location-Based Entertainment
- How Much Is the Hermès Cleaning Fee?
- Does Hermès Offer Free Repairs?
- The history of gun control in Australia
- Digital Marketing
- How to Mix and Match: Tips for Building Versatile Outfits from Your Wardrobe
- The Significance of Commercial Cleaning Services in Auckland: A Key Element of the Modern Cleaning Industry
- How RTP Impacts Online Casino Gaming: A Guide for Players and Operators
- How Authentic Employee Reviews Boost Employer Branding
- How to Choose the Best Online Casino: 5 Simple Steps
- Guaranteed Auto Financing
- Transform The Mudroom for The Festive Season
- Rustic Thanksgiving Ambiance with Farmhouse-inspired Doors