Pascal's Wager in the Nutshell
- Author Jamie Cassata
- Published May 26, 2012
- Word count 522
Most of us have heard of Pascal's Wager. Here is the argument in a nutshell: if one does not see the force of the various arguments for God's existence, one must "wager," or "bet," on whether God IS or whether God IS NOT.
If God actually does exist and you wager on him, you gain an infinite reward (EPIC WIN).
If God actually exists and you wager on him not existing, you have an infinite loss (EPIC FAIL).
On the other hand, if God does not actually exist and you wager on him existing, you lose nothing (FAIL).
And if God does not actually exist and you wager on him not existing, you gain nothing (meaningless win).
Therefore, since it is irrational to ever risk losing an infinite reward and having an infinite loss, it is rational to "wager" on God, and it would be irrational to wager against God.
Go on YouTube and you will find many, many videos of atheists insulting and trying to disprove this argument. The sheer number of the videos and the ferocity with which they resist the argument reveal how threatened atheists are by the argument. And for good reason. The truth is that the argument is a valid one and should scare the atheist to death. Check out Muse's "Thoughts of a Dying Atheist" (really good song).
The principal counter-argument used by atheists against the Wager appeals to the existence of different, mutually exclusive religions and "gods." In the words of atheist George H. Smith in his book Atheism: the Case Against God ,
"[Pascal] mistakenly regards Catholicism and total disbelief as the only two alternatives. Such is not the case. What of other non-Christian religions that prescribe punishment for Christians?…how are we to choose between alternative religions? Indeed, it is possible to have an unlimited number of religious doctrines, each of which prescribes eternal torment for all other beliefs" (184).
Amazingly, atheists tend to disregard an obvious point: to be reverential toward ANY god/religion reduces the risk of infinite loss and punishment, insofar as that god/religion just might be true. When the wager is made on no god whatsoever, the risk is substantially increased.
The force of the argument stands, because it is never reasonable to risk an infinite loss. With stakes at an infinite level, reason dictates that such a risk must be reduced as much as possible. The risk is further lowered when the claims and teachings of each religion are closely examined philosophically, historically, and otherwise, and one is chosen prudently.
Furthermore, the atheist is being disingenuous with his counter-argument because he knows full well that Christians, Jews, and Muslims all believe in the same eternal, all-powerful, all-knowing, creator God (HE WHO IS), though they understand aspects of his nature differently.
The matter is as simple as that. In the face of the possibility of eternal hell and the loss of heaven, it is irrational to believe in nothing.
It's equally important to remember that God's existence can be demonstrated through rationally persuasive arguments. See http://www.peterkreeft.com/topics-more/20_arguments-gods-existence.htm and my own website at http://JamieCassata.com
Jamie Cassata is a writer and internet marketer. He has his Master's of Theology from Franciscan University and is continuing studies in philosophy. He is currently writing a book on How to Argue with an Atheist.
Article source: https://articlebiz.comRate article
Article comments
There are no posted comments.
Related articles
- Would God Endorse a Woman for President?
- Love Is Not Love: Rediscovering True Love in a World of Confusion
- Did God Prevent Donald Trump from being KILLED?
- Indo-Islamic heritage dying out under aggressive Hindu-dominated narratives
- Can A Person be a Homosexual and a Christian at the Same Time?
- We are NOW to Enter into DEEPLY FRIGHTENING TIMES
- Will Another Hitler Rise up in Our Time?
- The Age of Israel: is there scriptural support that the elements of communion change into the Literal Body and Blood of Christ?
- Why I Subscribe to Spiritual Deism
- What Will the Job of the Christian be in the Kingdom of God?
- What Are Some of the Examples of the Literal and Figurative Interpretations of Scripture?
- What Are the Two Views Concerning the Eating of Christ’s Flesh and the Drinking of His Blood?
- What does it mean when God says you are rich in Christ?
- Surah Jin: The Mysterious Chapter Of The Quran
- The Theosophy of Jesus Christ: A View of Historical Influence
- World War III is Coming
- What does it mean when God says you are His Inheritance?
- The Gospel of Jesus Christ
- You Are Resurrected and Seated Together with Christ
- What does it mean when God says you are his workmanship?
- America: An Appeaser Nation
- What does it mean when God says you are an ambassador?
- What does it mean when God says you are a possessor of eternal life?
- should Women Preach?
- SCIENCE VS RELIGION: Why Science Must Give Credit to Religion
- Choosing Love Over Hate: The Authentic Christian Response to 9/11
- Paul and James: On Justification
- Wings of Despair
- Do People Die and go to Heaven?
- Brandon Robertson and his unbiblical teaching (part 1)