Laser Weapons and ‘Non-Lethal’ Arms Shop Slammed by Pentagon Report
Computers & Technology → Technology
- Author Shane Ennerson
- Published May 30, 2009
- Word count 973
The Department of Defense has long talked about the importance of non-lethal weapons — arms designed to minimize fatalities and unnecessary damage. But a new report from the non-partisan Government Accountability Office comprehensively demolishes the Pentagon’s Joint Non-lethal Weapons Program, finding fault with almost every aspect of its work. Years were spent developing useless systems, weapons were fielded without proper testing or adequate supplies of ammunition, and countless millions of dollars were wasted.
Established in 1996, the Joint Non-lethal Weapons Program is supposed to be the U.S. military’s central clearinghouse for researching, developing, testing, and training troops on these less-than-lethal arms. It’s also responsible for policies and procedures for how and when to use the weapons — while coordinating "requirements" for what the Army, Navy and Air Force might need in the future. According to the GAO, failed in just about all of these efforts.
Take R&D, for instance. "The Joint Non-lethal Weapons Program has conducted more than 50 research and development efforts and spent at least $386 million since 1997, but it has not developed any new weapons," the report says.
Perhaps the biggest flop was the Program’s most visible project — the Active Denial System, a microwave "pain beam" design to send crowds running. The core technology mostly works. But the system’s logistics make it way too tough to bring to a warzone. Not only does it have "several subsystems that are too complex for extensive field repair," according to the GAO. The system needs "about 16 hours" to reach its supercool operating temperature, "making it difficult to use on short notice unless the compressor is kept continuously running." The latest "prototype weighs more than 9 tons, and has been mounted on a heavier vehicle than the first prototype to accommodate additional armor and air-conditioning. Because of its weight, it is not easily used for missions requiring mobility." No wonder the program "terminated efforts" to deploy the Active Denial System overseas in 2008, after spending more than $55 million.
The reports also criticizes the Program for taking too long to recognize programs that simply aren’t getting anywhere. For example, there’s the Mobility Denial System, which used slippery foam to make area impassable to vehicles. Development went on for eight years at a cost of about $10 million until it was canceled "because it did not meet combat developers’ needs and its extensive water requirement was considered a logistics burden." The only positive outcome is for the guys who got to spend eight years having fun skidding jeeps and trucks over slippery foam.
Occasionally, the Program would buy systems from commercial vendors and field them "under urgent processes… in order to rapidly support an operational need." But those efforts often ran into logistical roadblocks, too. The report cites the FN303 Less-Lethal Launching System, or "paintball gun on steroids." The military spent about $2 million to evaluate it, only to terminate the effort because "the weapon was too heavy and ergonomically cumbersome, the weapon and ammunition magazine was too fragile, and the weapon required compressed air canisters in order to launch its non-lethal munitions. However, several dozen FN-303s were fielded to units even though their utility was limited by the availability of the canisters and the infrastructure to replenish them."
It cost $2 million to find that out? Note to developers: weapons aren’t much use without ammunition. Hopefully, this is a problem that the FN303’s replacement, the Variable Velocity Weapon System should solve.
The program did manage to field four items during the last dozen years: a 40 mm non-lethal crowd dispersal cartridge (a giant shotgun shell firing 48 rubber balls each of .48 caliber), the modular crowd control munition (a claymore mine firing 600 rubber balls), the portable vehicle arresting barrier ( a net device for catching vehicles which at a mere 645 pounds offers a new definition of ‘portable’) and the spiky Vehicle Lightweight Arresting Device,which is at least a bit more mobile (25 to 50 pounds depending on what you’re catching)
But the report notes that "of these, three are variations of or munitions for existing weapons, and the portable vehicle arresting barrier was in an early stage of development" when the Program took over. In other words, in the last twelve years the GAO don’t appear to credit the developers with developing and fielding anything.
And in the meantime, GAO says, the Program hasn’t managed to settle on unified policy on non-lethal weapons employment, nor come up with a definition of what counts as "acceptable risk" for the arms, nor devised a proper training plan. "DOD [Department of Defense] lacks a clear methodology for estimating the human effects of non-lethal weapons and does not fully test and evaluate many non-lethal weapons because they have been fielded under urgent operational requirements," according to the report. Apparently this is because "the urgent fielding process does not require safety or human effects testing for targets and bystanders… When non-lethal weapons are fielded through urgent fielding processes, human effects testing may be bypassed." This help may explain why non-lethal weapons in the field, like laser dazzlers, have caused eye injuries to U.S. troops.
The Pentagon seems to be accepting the criticism with hardly a murmur. The GAO showed them an early version of the report and say that: "The DOD concurred with five of our recommendations, partially concurred with the other three, and described actions it is taking or will take to implement all of the recommendations."
So we’ve had about twelve wasted years and, at the GAO’s rough estimate, $817 million of taxpayers’ money spent. Let’s hope that non-lethal weapons development shows a little more progress in the next twelve years. As Danger Room shows every week, there’s no shortage of technology out there. But without proper management, testing, policies for use, training and logistics support, none of it will ever be any use.
Dragonlasers - No 1 online store for green laser pointers & high power lasers
Article source: https://articlebiz.comRate article
Article comments
Related articles
- The Ultimate Guide to 3D Animation: From Basics to Advanced Techniques
- Mitsubishi Electric proves heat pump compatibility with microbore pipework
- Why Small to Large Companies Continue to Use Dated/Dinosaur Technology
- 10 Ways Business Central’s Quality Inspector App Streamlines Quality Assurance
- 10 Ways Business Central’s Quality Inspector App Streamlines Quality Assurance
- The Rise of Sustainable Technology: Shaping a Greener Future
- Why Bullseye Engagement Offers the Best OKR Software for Businesses
- Web Development Companies in Canada
- How EasyPDF™ Forms Save Time & Money at Home and in the Workplace
- The One and Only 15-Second Digital Lien Waiver to Complete and Submit in Record Time Using the Free Adobe Reader
- The Impact of Employer Branding on Leadership Recruitment
- Augmented Reality (AR) in Business: Why Your Company Needs It
- Top 10 Reasons to Use Business Central’s License Plating App
- The Hidden Advantages of European Offshore Development Companies
- App Development: Transforming Ideas into Reality
- Automate you Chauffeur Service with A to Z Dispatch
- The Impact of Machine Learning and AI on Business: What the Future Holds In the modern busine
- Generate Flashcards Fast with AI: The Ultimate Solution for Developers
- Blockchain Interview Guide: Essential Questions and Answers for Success
- Eight Free Business Central Apps That You’ll Wish You Had
- How Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) Are Transforming Computer-Based Trading Platforms
- The Role of Gas Engineers in Modern Energy Systems: Linking to Sustainability and Innovation
- The Significance of Stars in the Universe and Their Impact on Human Culture Throughout Evolution
- Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Urban Mobility Transformation: A Case Study of Guatemala City
- Top 10 Ways Business Central Users Streamline Shipping
- The Impact of AI on Job Security and Availability in Africa: A Future at a Crossroads
- CNC Machining Vs 3D Printing: Which Technology Is Right For Your Project?
- The Future of Search: Embracing AI-Powered Search Solutions
- Low-Fidelity Vs High-Fidelity Prototypes: When To Use Each In Product Design
- MARKET SEGMENTATION