Contrary to most beliefs, implied and oral contracts are still enforceable in Los Angeles.

Although it is much more difficult to prove than written contracts, it is still a valid way of creating business or employment relationships.

Implied and oral contracts in essence are agreements through spoken communication or those implied by actions or by law.

It is usually created by circumstances that imply that a contract exists through oral statements.

Implied and oral contracts may have physical proof of its existence as well; this includes documents where the agreed terms are written but the contract itself is not in a written form.

Although implied and oral contracts are just as valid as written agreements, some jurisdictions, however, require certain contracts to be in written form or should at least have written proof.

Consequently, actions for implied contracts may also have a shorter statute of limitation than that of written contracts.

Oral Contracts as Verbal Contracts

It is important to note though that oral contracts are different from verbal contracts.

A verbal contract actually refers to all contracts that are expressed in words.

It does not matter if the words are written or spoken; as long as words are used in the agreement, then it is considered a verbal contract.

Implied vs. Express Terms in Contracts

Contract terms, especially on oral agreements, can be expressed or implied.

The terms of the contract are said to be expressed if there are no ambiguity in the words used, which means that both parties understood their duties and rights without any confusion.

These contracts are easier to enforce as there is generally no difference in the interpretation of the agreement terms.

However, if the duties and obligations of the parties are not expressly specified but are proven by the act or conduct, then the contract terms is considered implied.

The terms of the contract can be expressed through law and customs.

Major Problems with Implied and Oral Contracts

With the burden of proof in the shoulders of the plaintiff, it can be very difficult to prove a breach of contract.

The major block in proving a breach of contract in implied and oral contracts is usually the lack of evidence to prove its existence.

At least with written contracts, the terms are usually expressly specified and everything is in black and white.

With implied and oral contracts, the plaintiff will have to gather evidence to prove that there is an agreement with the other party.

Normally, the evidence would include evaluation given by the other party to the plaintiff regarding their service and the length of time where the plaintiff assumed that they have an agreement.

The best move that the plaintiff can take is to talk to a lawyer who can help him sort out his rights and duties in an implied or oral contract.